Home

A short survey on peer review

If you review for journals, we would like to know how it works for you: how much you review, what makes you say yes or no, and what you think would make peer review better. No sign-in is needed.

About this survey

Run by Peerclave (Strata Collective Ltd) with academic collaborators at the University of Glasgow. Peerclave provides paid peer review to medical journals, so it has a commercial interest, and says so wherever it publishes. Your answers are anonymous, with no name, email or account. Taking part is voluntary, you must be 18 or over, and the results will be published.

0 of 21 answeredOnly question 1 is required

About your reviewing

1. Have you peer reviewed for a journal in the last three years?

We use this to tell reviewers' answers apart from everyone else's.

2. How many manuscripts do you review in a year?
a year

0Move the slider or type a number. You can skip this.100+

3. How many review requests do you get in a year?
a year

0Move the slider or type a number. You can skip this.100+

4. How long does a typical review take you, start to finish?
hours

0Move the slider or type a number. You can skip this.20+

5. How many years have you been reviewing for journals?
years

0Move the slider or type a number. You can skip this.40+

What works and what does not

6. Overall, how satisfied are you with peer review as it works today?
out of 100

0, not at all satisfiedMove the slider or type a number. You can skip this.100, completely satisfied

7. What deadline do you find workable for a full review?
8. What most often makes you say no to a review?

Tick any that apply.

9. Have you ever been paid for a peer review?
10. What is your view on being paid for peer review?
11. What is the biggest problem with peer review today?

Optional. Please do not include names of people, journals or manuscripts.

Ways of improving peer review

12. How much would each of these improve peer review?

0 means not at all, 100 means a great deal. Skip any you have no view on.

  • –
  • –
  • –
  • –
  • –
  • –
13. What do you think could be done to improve peer review?

Optional. Please do not include names of people, journals or manuscripts.

14. Do you use AI tools when you review?

About you

15. Do you review mainly for medical or health journals?
16. Which best describes your work?
17. Where are you in your career?
18. Are you, or have you been, a journal editor or editorial board member?
19. How do you describe your gender?
20. What is your main field?
21. Which country do you work in?

Taken together, your career stage, field and country describe a small group. We keep them only to describe who answered, and never publish a group of fewer than 10.

Stay in touch

Optional. Your answers stay anonymous. If you would like to hear more, tick a box and leave an email address. It is stored on its own and used only for what you tick.

Leaving the page before you send stores nothing.